Feeds:
Posts
Comments

I love reading Chick lit. For the uninitiated, that’s fiction targeted at single women around 30 years of age, consisting of a good dose of humor and maybe some romance in it.

“Although usually including romantic elements, women’s fiction (including chick lit) is generally not considered a direct subcategory of the romance novel genre, because in women’s fiction the heroine’s relationship with her family or friends may be equally as important as her relationship with the hero.”, says Wikipedia.

Of course, I have already read “The Devil wears Prada”, “Everyone worth Knowing” and “Chasing Harry Winston”, by the author Lauren Weisberger. They are classic examples of chick lit.

 One author I discovered recently was Megan Crane. I read her “English as a second language”, which was hilarious, engaging, and kept me company as only a friend could! It also happens to be her first novel.

The story is about Alexandra Brennan, who decides to leave the US and her dead-end job there to study her Master’s in English Literature in the UK. All because her ex-boyfriend said she didn’t have it in her. She makes new friends, adopts a nocturnal lifestyle that involves hanging out at the pub, sleepwalks through classes during the day, draws a motley crew of friends and acquaintances toward her with whom she experiences several misadventures, only to discover that she has found home. What sets this book apart is the author’s AMAZING sense of humour. Each sentence is hilarious. The writing style is light and irreverent. I can’t wait to read her other titles “Names my sisters call me”, “Frenemies”, and “Everyone else’s girl”.

If there is one book on punctuation I’d recommend to everyone, it’s “Eats shoots and leaves” by Lynne Truss. In this book, Lynne Truss has dealt with all matters related to punctuation in a humorous and engaging fashion. This not only removes the “boring” tag associated with the subject of punctuation, but also gets people involved in punctuating well.

 

The very title of the book is derived from a famous joke, which has done its rounds all over the world. In case you haven’t heard it, here goes… 

 

A panda walks into a café. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air. 

 

“Why?” asks the confused waiter as the panda leaves the café. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder. 

 

“I’m a panda,” he says, at the door. “Look it up”. 

 

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation. 

 

“Panda: Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves.” 

 

In case you are still wondering what that meant…the trick is in the comma placed after “Eats” in “Eats, shoots and leaves.” This comma implies that someone eats something, shoots, and then leaves the scene. The correct entry, of course, would be “Eats shoots and leaves” minus the comma after “Eats” to imply eating shoots ( as in bamboo shoots) and leaves( of plants and trees). 

 

Now that I have killed the punchline and demystified the joke completely, wouldn’t you agree that a misplaced comma can totally change the meaning of a sentence or a phrase? 

 

By giving real-life examples from badly written street signs (Come inside for CD’s, VIDEO’s, DVD’s, and BOOK’s) to improperly punctuated movie titles( Two weeks notice), this book is a ready reckoner for people with a sense of humor. She covers apostrophes, commas, dashes, hyphens, and even emoticons (keeping in mind the Instant Messaging era).  

 

I just noticed one glaring (at least to an ex-editor) error, though. The title page of the book says “The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation”. If she had read her own chapter on hyphens, that should have been “The Zero-Tolerance Approach to Punctuation”. 

 

That shouldn’t stop you from reading the book, though :) 

Should we write as we speak or speak as we write?

 

According to Jyoti Sanyal, author of “Indlish—the book for every English-Speaking Indian”, this debate has been going on for centuries. He says that written English began as a write-as-you speak movement. Casual, simple writing was encouraged. A good example of this is Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, which was very close to the speech of that time. Fifty years later, Dr. Samuel Johnson (1709-1784) felt that plain English was not ornate enough and encouraged people to speak as they would write. Thus, began flowery language. William Wordsworth (1770-1850) reversed the rule again when he said that poetry should use the real language of men. Then, the Victorians brought back pompous writing into vogue. The famous Charles Dickens’ character Micawber in David Copperfield was so afraid of speaking ordinarily that he always wrote down something in stilted English and read it out!

 

The King’s English, published in 1901, told aspiring writers to be ‘direct, simple, brief, vigorous and lucid’. This trend has more or less continued. Strunk and White’s “The Elements of Style” that all writers refer to also advocates simplicity and clarity of thought in writing. We are asked to “omit needless words” and “avoid a succession of loose sentences”. In the chapter on style, Strunk and White advises us to write in a way that comes naturally to us and use words and phrases that come readily to hand.

 

But it’s a particularly Indian trait to equate “impressive” English with incomprehensible English. We use high-sounding words, words that are archaic, stilted, and no longer in vogue just to sound educated and prove that we are intellectual.

 

However, with globalization of the economy and outsourcing, we are now trying to embrace American English. Americans are known for their informal, direct and casual communication.

 

While writing marketing collateral, we’ve been trained to be direct and pragmatic, and to omit “marketing fluff” or jargon. We are encouraged to stick to what’s familiar, speaking in the reader’s own language. Direct, clear writing that is refreshing in its simplicity is the need of the hour. Even the client endorsements we provide in our collateral need to sound genuine, like someone would have actually said them; not something they were persuaded to come up with for the sake of it.

 

David Crystal’s Blog

Here is the link to David Crystal’s Blog.

http://david-crystal.blogspot.com/

David Crystal is an authority on the English Language. Here’s a brief introduction to the man who needs no introduction among linguists:)

http://www.sfep.org.uk/pub/biogs/crystal.asp

What to read next?

Enter a book you like and the site will analyse its database of real readers’
favourite books (over 32,000 and growing) to suggest what you could read next.
http://whatshouldireadnext.com/

Here are some really useful sites on UK and US English:

http://english2american.com/index.html#index

http://www.hps.com/~tpg/ukdict/

Bucknor: (n) (adj)
1. Temporary blindness leading to missing out on the obvious.
2. To be at the wrong place at the wrong time.

3. Situations leading to grave judgmental errors.
Usage: I feel bucknored by my boss;  Life often throws a bucknor at you.

Benson: (n) (adj)
1. Something that legitimises a severe bucknor.
Usage: First they bucknored me and then they bensoned it! I am toast.

Also see bucknor

Infosys, Bangalore : An employee applied for leave as follows:

“Since I have to go to my village to sell my land along with my wife, please sanction me one-week leave.”



· This is from Oracle Bangalore : >From an employee who was performing the “mundan” ceremony of his 10 year old son:

“as I want to shave my son’s head, please leave me for two days..”



· Another gem from CDAC. Leave-letter from an employee who was performing his daughter’s wedding:

“as I am marrying my daughter, please grant a week’s leave..”



· From H.A.L. Administration Dept:

“As my mother-in-law has expired and I am only one responsible for it, please grant me 10 days leave.”



· Another employee applied for half day leave as follows:

“Since I’ve to go to the cremation ground at 10 o-clock and I may not return, please grant me half day casual leave”



· An incident of a leave letter:

“I am suffering from fever, please declare one-day holiday.”



· A leave letter to the headmaster:

“As I am studying in this school I am suffering from headache. I request you to leave me today”



· Another leave letter written to the headmaster:

“As my headache is paining, please grant me leave for the day.”



· Covering note:

“I am enclosed herewith…”



· Another one:

“Dear Sir: with reference to the above, please refer to my below…”



· Actual letter written for application of leave:

“My wife is suffering from sickness and as I am her only husband at home I may be granted leave”.



· Letter writing:-

“I am well here and hope you are also in the same well.”



· A candidate’s job application:

“This has reference to your advertisement calling for a ‘ Typist and an Accountant – Male or Female’… As I am both(!! )for the past several years and I can handle both with good experience, I am applying for the position

This came as a forwarded mail.

Headlines Today!

Ideas, Out of Stock!

   – (04-11-2007)

Jon Stock  
I do like a good headline. Not the jingoistic ones favoured by the tabloid press, but those which make you stop turning the page and smile. “Gotcha!”, The Sun’s response to the British sinking of the General Belgrano during the Falklands War, was iconic, but also sickening. “New Bridges Held up by Red Tape” or “Sex Education Delayed, Teachers Request Training” are more to my liking.
When I was living in Delhi, I used to cut out my favourites from the Indian press. “Jayalalitha Questioned over Bogey Probe” appealed to my childish sense of humour, but only because in Britain bogeys live up noses rather than on railway tracks.

This term, at our village school, my children have been learning all about newspapers and I was asked to give a short talk about headlines to Year Four (eight-year olds-about my level). They had already been told that headlines should be snappy and informative, which didn’t sit very well with my first example. There are two things you need to know before I share it (stay with me, it’s a gem). The first is that there is a football team in Scotland called Inverness Caledonian Thistle, known affectionately as Caley. The second is that one of the most popular songs in the famous 1964 film of Mary Poppins is called “Super-cali-fragilistic-expiali-docious”.
So, when Inverness Caledonian Thistle beat Celtic in the Scottish Cup in 2000, the subs at The Sun duly put two and two together and came up with arguably the wittiest headline of all time: “Super Caley Go Ballistic, Celtic Are Atrocious”.

The children loved this one, not least because they knew the original song. Its comprehension also came with a sense of breaking a code. Others which tickled the assembled eight-year olds included “Hospitals are Sued by Seven Foot Doctors”; “Children Make Nutritious Snacks”; “Stolen Painting Found  by Tree”; “Man Minus Ear Waives Hearing”; Typhoon Rips Through Cemetery, Hundreds Dead” and “The Umpire Strikes Back” (about a dodgy umpire decision on the subcontinent).

The internet, of course, has turned funny headlines into a small industry. There are hundreds of different sites listing unintentionally amusing ones from the world’s press. Many of them I couldn’t possibly have shared with my school: “Clinton places Dickey in Gore’s Hands; “Clinton Stiff on Withdrawal”; Starr Aghast at First Lady Sex Position” or “Prostitutes Appeal to Pope”. You suspect with many of these that the subs knew exactly what they were doing and just wanted to see what they could get passed the editor. When the late newspaper proprietor, Robert Maxwell, was destroying the Daily Mirror, morale was so low at the tabloid paper that staff tried desperately to get their own back. The political cartoonist, for example, managed to write “Robert Maxwell is a ****” in tiny writing, hidden in his last cartoon for the paper.

Naughty headlines are a more subtle form of rebellion, allowing staff to let off steam, while the paper can look the other way and maintain a cloak of decency. That, at least, can be the only explanation for “Chef Throws his Heart into Helping Feed the Needy” or even “Survivor of Siamese Twins Joins Parents”. At the end of my little school chat, which I resisted ending with “Chinese Killed in Car Clash”, I asked them to come up with some headlines of their own. If they had a story about an owl which looked funny, how would they caption the story? “What a hoot!” came back the answer, quick as a flash, confirming that there is a new generation of headline writers in the waiting.  

They finished by asking for my most recent favourite, and I had to tell them it was for a book which we’ve been serialising in my newspaper, all about female Spitfire pilots in the Second World War: “Frocks Away!”. They all looked at me blankly, until I explained that pilots used to shout “chocks away!” before taking off.  
As you can see, I like nothing better than a good headline, and I shall be looking closely to see what the fine subs at THE WEEK come up with at the top of this column. In the meantime, I could do with some help from readers, as the school has asked me to come back and talk to the older children about Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Could I come up with some headlines for the most famous scenes? In the meantime, I shall leave you with another personal favourite: “Man Struck by Lightning Faces Battery Charge”.

Source:http://week.manoramaonline.com/cgi-bin/MMOnline.dll/portal/ep/theWeekContent.do?BV_ID=@@@&contentType=EDITORIAL&sectionName=TheWeek%20Last%20Word&programId=1073754894&contentId=3109328

Older Posts »